Stream Water Chemistry and Quality
Objectives
The SRBEX stream water chemistry component focuses on the roles that
watershed scale, lithology, climate, and landuse/landcover play in
controlling weathering rates and stream water quality.
This investigation supports the SRBEX modeling activities in two ways:
by obtaining insight into how hydrological processes should be modeled
at increasing scales, and by helping to validate the models.
Current Activities
During the initial phase of this study, we have compiled a water-quality
database for 59 sampling stations in the Susquehanna River Basin (SRB)
in Pennsylvania and Maryland. Catchments associated with the stations
form a nested hierarchy of watersheds representing a suite of scales,
lithologies and land uses. The database consists of all the available
stream chemistry for each station, its location, the boundaries of its
catchment area (digitized from 1:250,000 scale topographic maps), and,
within the drainage basin, the lithology, stream network, and
landuse/landcover. The data products are in Arc/Info export format and
are available to other EOS and scientific investigators.
Using this database, we have completed a series of mass balance
calculations of weathering fluxes of magnesium and silica(Richards and Kump,
1994b). These species have been chosen as a proxy for weathering
over calcium and alkalinity becuase they come primarily from silicate
minerals, at least in carbonate-poor units; agricultural practices
commonly introduce large quantities of lime to watersheds which can
greatly increse the alkalinity and Ca in runoff.
We have also developed a function relating concentration to discharge
rate (Richards and
Kump,1994a) that we have linked to the terrestrial hydrology model.
Results
The major findings from these studies include
- Weathering fluxes in the SRB are a strong function of the lithology
and the extent of mining in a watershed.
- Mg fluxes are controlled by the amount of carbonate in the
watershed.
- Mg fluxes from watersheds with abundant mining operations were found
to be 6 to 10 times higher than fluxes from comparable pristine
watersheds. Mining practices are believed to enhance chemical
weathering by increasing the surface area of unweathered rock accessible
to water.
- Weathering fluxes were found to increase with watershed scale. This
scale dependance is believed to be caused by the inclusion of small
amounts of carbonate at larger scales that are not taken into account in
our lithology estimates.
- Flux-concentration-discharge relationships for the stations suggest
that elemental fluxes in the SRB vary primarily with discharge and that
export rates can be accurately modelled with a simple power function.
The empirical constants for this function were found to vary with scale
and dissolved species but not land use or lithology. The results
indicate that small catchments, typical of the watersheds for which most
hydrological models are developed, differ fundamentally from large
watersheds. Fluxes from small watersheds are controlled by the
chemistry and water residence time of flow paths in soils and fractured
bedrock, whereas fluxes from larger scale watersheds represent the
mixing of fluxes from the a number of sub-watersheds.
Last change: 9 May 1995,
R. A. White / raw@essc.psu.edu