General Circulation Model Linkage to Mesoscale Model

Objectives

A primary goal of SRBEX is linking global-scale climate change to regional climate with a particular emphasis on the hydrologic components. An important component of this effort is comparing statistics from a global-scale general circulation model (GCM), from a regional-scale climate model, and from actual meteorological observations to characterize model performance and improve the linkage between models. The initial comparisons use horizontal grid spacings of approximately 500 km and 100 km for the GCM and regional-scale models, respectively. These results will provide the necessary framework for using a regional-scale model with nesting capabiities, where the innermost nested domain would have a grid spacing below 10 km.

Current Activities

Coupled GCM/regional-scale simulations have been undertaken with the GENESIS GCM (Thompson and Pollard, 1994; Pollard and Thompson, 1994)and a mesoscale model (MM Version 4) which has been altered for climate studies. The altered version of the MM is known as the RegCM2 (Giorgi et al., 1993a; 1993b)and has been used in a number of climate studies. RegCM2 is driven at the lateral boundaries (outer 4 grid points) with meteorological fields (temperature, wind components, humidity, and surface pressure) from the GENESIS GCM every 12 hours.

The GENESIS simulation has been integrated for 10 years using observed sea-surface temperatures (the AMIP data set) for the 1979-1988 time period. The GENESIS GCM uses a horizontal resolution of 4.5 (latitude) by 7.5 (longitude) degrees and 12 vertical levels. It also uses a land-surface package (LSX) in which heat, momentum, and moisture fluxes from the biosphere are computed on a horizontal grid with a resolution of 2 by 2 degrees. The coupled GCM/RegCM2 simulations are being run for the same ten-year time period.

The primary focus of the RegCM2 simulations has been on the Eastern U.S., since the Susquehanna River Basin is the area of interest. Accordingly, one initial set of simulations has used a domain centered on central Pennsylvania (41 degrees north latitude, 77 degrees west longitude), using a 30 by 30 array of 108km-square grid cells. This places the western boundary of the RegCM2 grid in Kansas, the eastern boundary over the western Atlantic, the northern boundary over Hudson Bay and the southern boundary over the southern U.S..

To study the effect of lateral boundary conditions on the RegCM2 results, a second set of simulations has used an expanded domain that includes the 48 conterminous U.S. and parts of southern Canada, the eastern Pacific, and the Gulf of Mexico. This domain is centered near the Kansas-Missouri border (40 degrees north latitude, 95 degree west longitude) and uses a 60 (east-west) by 42 (north-south) array or 108 km grid cells.

Results

To date, only the model outputs for about the first year, beginning 1 December 1979, have been examined carefully. Results for the first six months are presented in detail in the 1994 annual report and the references cited therein.

Highlights of the results to date include

  • The coupled RegCM2/GENESIS simulation produced more realistic results than GENESIS alone.

  • Simulated 500 mb surfaces were in rough agreement with actual meteorologocial observations.

  • Simulated precipitation for the limited domain (eastern two-thirds of the U.S.) was much less than the observed values over the western part of the domain (Mississippi Valley and eastern Great Plains).

  • The extended domain simulated precipitation somewhat more accurately; some of the remaining discrepancies appear associated with the way the GCM models circulation.


    Last change: 2 May 1995, R. A. White / raw@essc.psu.edu